Friday, May 24, 2013

Shouldn't all pharmaceutical professionals too take the Hippocratic Oath?


The news about the generic drug maker Ranbaxy Labs pleading guilty to felony charges related to drug safety and its acceptance of $500 million in civil and criminal fines created an unprecedented buzz in the world-wide web. The most incisive piece by far appears to be “the epic inside story of long-term criminal fraud at Ranbaxy.....” By Katherine Eban on CNN Money.

No horror story is complete without its share of seedy alleys, murky dealings & closed cup-boards that contain multitudes of hidden skeletons - this too has. Even as all the digging is indeed required towards a total expose’, the associated spill/ shoot-out of emotional rhetoric is threatening to harm the still-early but the strong trend of genericization of global medicare.

Can we raise above the rhetoric of branded drugs v/s generic drugs; first-world v/s third-world & address the core issue of why medical frauds happen & what can be done to plug these? 

My Comment on the above article:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A very compelling narrative & an alarmingly scary proposition…. 

I fully agree with the majority opinion here that the consequences of a fraud this big should be equally big for the company in question. But again, I also endorse the opinion of a few others like Sam Werbalowsky, 
Dan Miller et al who have pointed out that Ranbaxy isn't a standalone case in the shameful history of pharmaceutical frauds & that the focus should be on ethical business of all Pharma & not just the generic players as Ranbaxy – It is important to underscore this particular aspect at this juncture since the tone & tenor of this otherwise brilliant piece makes it prone to being construed as a platform for demonizing the generic medicine vis-a-vis' branded drugs. 

A quick look at the list of infamy here & here establishes that the common thread running through all is the disturbing trend of the best-of-the-organizations taking a call of preferring earnings over ethics at critical decision points. Another common aspect among all is the seeming complicity of a vast number of employees at all levels of the organization to misrepresenting a fact or manipulating an outcome. This shows that the problem is not just at the top decision making levels but is endemic at all levels of hierarchy & there’s this shocking apathy all through to what amounts to ethical behavior of an average worker/ employee in a pharmaceutical organization.



Given the complete insulation of an average pharmaceutical employee to the consumer-end of the spectrum & hence insulation from the consequences of any wrong-doing, I'm a little sceptical as to what will motivate these people to be vigilantes of public health & safety at their work place, pardon my cheekiness here, whether or not that involves whistle-blower benefits – THIS apparent lack of ownership of public health & safety in pharmaceutical manufacturing world is what I believe is the real core problem.


While there may be much creative reasoning & some complex solutions to the above core problem, I’d like to keep it simple & say that the reason is a lack of any formal sensitization of a pharmaceutical industry worker prior to or during his/ her employment on her/ his own accountability to public health & safety in general & the solution I hence propose is to instil this accountability in all pharmaceutical employees by way of a Hippocratic Oath that unfortunately is currently merely confined to medical practitioners & decreasingly so.


Food for thought.

Ref: my earlier post at:

3 comments:

Unknown said...

My blogs generating some engagement finally,... but on a repro' on another site.....

do check the action at http://phdig.groupsite.com/beta/discussion/topics/598237/messages

Unknown said...

a clarification on posted on PhDG on my suggestion for a 'Hippocratic Oath"

Thank you for your comments gents.

Absolutely agree that the CEOs should continue to be held responsible for whatever goes wrong in their company & regulators should continue to monitor compliance & police those who do a shoddy job of policing themselves - It's absolutely necessary and all frauds as these will only make the regulation tighter - but somewhere in all this, I felt the vast majority of the stakeholder group, the employees are completely factored-out of the picture.

When I mentioned the Hippocratic Oath for the pharmaceutical workforce, I was merely postulating a symbolic gesture, an excuse really to reaffirm the need for personal integrity within a work-space that impacts public health - I of course didn't mean this as something that would eliminate the fraudulent practices on its own. So while I do understand the limitations of an oath, I also believe simple concepts as these aren't necessarily simplistic in their impact & reposing some trust in symbolic practices shouldn't be regarded as being old-fashioned.

But again, it's only an idea.

Unknown said...

I was curious if the concept of a Hippocratic Oath for the Pharmaceutical professionals has already been proposed anytime - I found two such instances...

1. The "Pharmaceutical Hippocratic Oath" proposed by Lord Kenneth McDonald, Chair of Reprieve's Board of Trustees in early 2012- the context of this oath is of course is in the context of pharmaceutical organizations NOT allowing their products to be used for termination of a human life.

http://www.reprieve.org.uk/publiceducation/2012_03_26_pharma_hippocratic_oath/

2.The HIPPOCRATIC OATH for Pharmaceutical Industry (This Version by Prof. Vivek Hattangadi author of ‘WHAT THE PHARMA CEO WANTS FROM THE BRAND MANAGER’)available at the following link;

http://www.linkedin.com/groups/HIPPOCRATIC-OATH-Pharmaceutical-Industry-This-3596507.S.87278367